Abstract

Background: Ma2 antibodies belong to the onconeuronal antibodies which define a “definite” paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS). Because of the clinical relevance, use of two separate methods (indirect immunofluores-cence technique - IFT - and immunoblot) is advocated; however, with an increasing number of commercially available assay systems, usually only one assay is performed.
Methods: We compared IFT and three commercially available immunoblots (ravo Diagnostika, Euroimmun, Milenia Biotec) on sera from 35 patients with clinically suspected PNS. 17 were Ma2 antibody associated as defined by consensus result (showing positive reactivity in 2 assays), 18 were Ma2 antibody negative controls.
Results: Sensitivity / specificity for single assays were for IFT 94 % / 94 %, for ravo Diagnostika PNS blot 88 % / 100 %, for Euroimmun Neuronal Antigens Profile blot 100 % / 89 %, and for Milenia Biotec MTR blot 94 % / 100 %.
Conclusions: Our data confirm, although all tests performed well, a combination of 2 independent assays is still advisable for Ma2 antibody detection in order to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity rates.

DOI: Clin. Lab. 2011;57:321-326