|
|
Background: Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer is associated with BRCA gene mutations. As large volumes of clinical data on BRCA variants are continuously updated, their clinical interpretation may change, leading to their reclassification. This study analyzed the class and proportion of the changed clinical interpretations of BRCA variants to validate the need for periodic reviews of these variants.
Methods: This retrospective study reinterpreted previously reported BRCA1 and BRCA2 exon variants according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines and the clinical significance of the recent public genomic database. Reanalyzed results were obtained for patients tested for BRCA genetic mutation for 10 years and 4 months.
Results: We included data from 4,058 patients, with 595 having at least one pathogenic variant (P), likely pathogenic variant (LP), or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) at a detection rate of 14.66%. The numbers of exon and intron variants were 562 (87.81%) and 78 (12.19%), respectively. BRCA1 exhibited a significantly higher P/LP detection rate of 6.96% compared to that of BRCA2 at 6.89% (p < 0.001). Conversely, BRCA2 demonstrated a significantly higher VUS rate of 10.38% compared to that of BRCA1 at 5.08% (p < 0.001). Among BRCA1 mutations, substitutions were the most prevalent in P/LP and VUS. Among BRCA2 mutations, deletions were most prevalent in P/LP, and substitutions were most prevalent in VUS. Among the 131 patients with P/LP in BRCA1 exons, the clinical interpretation was reclassified in two cases (1.53%), one VUS and one benign/likely benign (B/LB), and 48 cases (48.00%) with VUS were reclassified; one to P/LP and 47 to B/LB. Among the 138 patients with P/LP in BRCA2 exons, the clinical interpretation was reclassified in six (4.35%), five to VUS, and one to B/LB, and all 74 with VUS were reclassified to B/LB.
Conclusions: We determined the class and proportion of reclassified BRCA variants. In conclusion, reviews are required to provide clinical guidance, such as determining treatment direction and preventive measures in the future.
DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230911
|
