You have to be registered and logged in for purchasing articles.


Comparing PyroMark Q24 Pyrosequencing and MALDI-TOF MS for Identification of CYP2D6*10 by Daijun Xiang, Chen Chen, Shang He, Mianyang Li, Chengbin Wang

Background: CYP2D6*10 is mainly responsible for the large pharmacokinetic variability of routinely administered metoprolol in middle-aged and elderly Asian patients. Utilizing an efficient method for identifying the CYP2D6*10 genotypes is clinically important for evaluating the pharmacokinetic effect of administration of metoprolol. This study attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of the two methods used to detect the rs1065852 and rs1135840 SNPs of the CYP2D6*10 gene.
Methods: Blood samples were processed for the collection of genomic DNA from 198 subjects across Chinese population, and detection of CYP2D6*10 (rs1065852 and rs1135840) was performed using the PyroMark Q24 pyrose-quencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The discordant results were further validated with Sanger sequencing. We eventually attempted to assess some features of these two methods including reliability, rapidness, being appropriate, and cost-effectiveness.
Results: Genotyping of rs1065852 and rs1135840 detected by MALDI-TOF MS were concordant with those identified by PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing in all 198 (100%) individuals. The hands-on-time and the turnaround time were shorter in the PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing method than in the MALDI-TOF MS method for SNP of CYP2D6*10. In terms of being cost-effective and high-throughput, the MALDI-TOF MS method outperformed the PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing method.
Conclusions: CYP2D6*10 genotypes detected by PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing and MALDI-TOF-MS showed that both methods were reliable, rapid, appropriate, and cost-effective methods. These methods are valuable for clinical applications.

DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180909