You have to be registered and logged in for purchasing articles.

Abstract

Application and Comparison of Laboratory Parameters for Forecasting Severe Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Using Logistic Regression, Discriminant Analysis and Decision Tree by Meili Sui, Xueyong Huang, Yi Li, Xiaomei Ma, Chao Zhang, Xingle Li, Zhijuan Chen, Haiyan Yang, Yuanlin Xi, Huifen Feng, Jingchao Ren, Fang Wang, Bianli Xu, Guangcai Duan

Background: In recent years, the prevalence of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) in China and some other countries has caused worldwide concern. Mild cases tend to recover within a week, while severe cases may progress rapidly and tend to have bad outcome. Since there is no vaccine for HFMD and anti-inflammatory treatment is not ideal. In this study, we aimed to establish a valid forecasting model for severe HFMD using common laboratory parameters.
Methods: Retrospectively, 77 severe HFMD cases from Zhengzhou Children′s hospital in the peaking period between years 2013 to 2015 were collected, with 77 mild HFMD cases in the same area. The study recorded common laboratory parameters to assist in establishment of the severe HFMD model. After screening the important variables using Mann-Whitney U test, the study also matched the logistic regression (LR), discriminant analysis (DA), and decision tree (DT) to make a comparison.
Results: Compared with that of the mild group, serum levels of WBC, PLT, PCT, MCV, MCH, LCR, SCR, LCC, GLO, CK-MB, K, S100, and B in the severe group were higher (p < 0.05), while MCR, EOR, BASOR, SCC, MCC, EO, BASO, NA, CL, T, Th, and Th/Ts were lower (p < 0.05). Five indicators including MCR, LCC, Th, CK-MB, and CL were screened out by LR and the same for DA, and five variables including EO, LCC, CL, GLO, and MCC screened out by DT. The area under the curve (AUC) of LR, DA, and DT was 0.805, 0.779 and 0.864, respectively.
Conclusions: The findings were that common laboratory indexes were effectively used to distinguish the mild HFMD cases and severe HFMD cases by LR, DA, and DT, and DT had the best classification effect with an AUC of 0.864.

DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.150917